Sustainable Development of Indian Himalayan Region
Recent Supreme Court judgments have emphasized the need for a sustainable development model for the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR).
Key Judicial Interventions
- MK Ranjitsinh vs. Union of India (2024): Recognized the right to be free from adverse climate change impacts under Articles 14 and 21.
- Ashok Kumar Raghav vs. Union of India (2023): Directed the government to assess the carrying capacity of Himalayan states.
- State of Telangana vs. Mohd. Abdul Qasim: Advocated for an eco-centric approach to environmental conservation.
Significance of the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR)
- Spans 13 states/UTs, covering 18% of India’s landmass.
- Houses 50% of India's forests and biodiversity.
- Plays a crucial ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
To get access to detailed content
Already a Member? Login here
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material since 2018 of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Current Affairs
- 1 Right to Silence
- 2 Right to Change Name
- 3 Prevention of Damage to Public Property
- 4 Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act 2023
- 5 Rule 176 vs. Rule 267 of Rajya Sabha
- 6 Digital India Land Records Modernization Programme (DILRMP)
- 7 Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privileges: SC
- 8 Vibrant Villages Programme
- 9 The Coalition of Coastal Cities
- 10 e-Court Phase III