Sub-classification of Scheduled Castes (SCs)
In August 2024, Supreme Court’s 7-judge bench upheld sub-classification within SCs as constitutionally valid.
- The judgment was delivered in State of Punjab & Others vs. Davinder Singh & Others case.
- The SC overruled E.V. Chinnaiah vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (2005) verdict which barred sub-categorization.
- Sub-classification aims to ensure substantive equality of opportunity (Article 15(4), 16(4)).
- The Court ruled sub-classification does not violate Article 341(2).
- State must collect adequate data on backwardness and representation for sub-classification.
- Reservation of 100% seats for one subgroup prohibited.
- Decision is subject to judicial review.
- Four judges recommended extending Creamy Layer Principle to SCs/STs (non-binding).
Important .... |
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
To get access to detailed content
Already a Member? Login here
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material since 2018 of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Current Affairs
- 1 Right to Silence
- 2 Right to Change Name
- 3 Prevention of Damage to Public Property
- 4 Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act 2023
- 5 Rule 176 vs. Rule 267 of Rajya Sabha
- 6 Digital India Land Records Modernization Programme (DILRMP)
- 7 Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privileges: SC
- 8 Vibrant Villages Programme
- 9 The Coalition of Coastal Cities
- 10 e-Court Phase III