Sustainable Development of Indian Himalayan Region

Recent Supreme Court judgments have emphasized the need for a sustainable development model for the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR).

Key Judicial Interventions

  • MK Ranjitsinh vs. Union of India (2024): Recognized the right to be free from adverse climate change impacts under Articles 14 and 21.
  • Ashok Kumar Raghav vs. Union of India (2023): Directed the government to assess the carrying capacity of Himalayan states.
  • State of Telangana vs. Mohd. Abdul Qasim: Advocated for an eco-centric approach to environmental conservation.

Significance of the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR)

  • Spans 13 states/UTs, covering 18% of India’s landmass.
  • Houses 50% of India's forests and biodiversity.
  • Plays a crucial ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now

To get access to detailed content

Already a Member? Login here


Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material before the last six months of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.

Related Content