Moral Relativism vs. Moral Universalism
The debate between moral relativism and moral universalism centers on whether ethical principles are culturally dependent or universally applicable. This philosophical discussion has significant implications for cross-cultural interactions, global ethics, and the development of universally accepted moral standards.
Moral Relativism in Civil Services
- Moral Relativism posits that moral values and ethical principles are not absolute but vary across different cultures and societies. This perspective emphasizes understanding and respecting cultural diversity when making decisions.
Significance
- Cultural Sensitivity: Helps tailor policies to respect diverse cultural practices, ensuring inclusiveness. Example: India's constitution recognizes cultural diversity with different personal laws for various religious communities.
- Flexibility: ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
To get access to detailed content
Already a Member? Login here
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material since 2018 of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Ethics, Integrity & Aptitude
- 1 Impact of Probity in Governance on Administrative Effectiveness and Public Trust
- 2 AI in Decision Making: Impact on Administration
- 3 Ethical Issues and Challenges in Social Media
- 4 Moral Values and Ethical Leadership
- 5 Ethical Dimensions of Celebrity Endorsements
- 6 Bioethics and its Significance
- 7 Foundational Values of Civil Services: Measures to Ensure their Effectiveness
- 8 Relevance of Swami Vivekananda’s Moral Philosophy in Contemporary Society
- 9 Role of Impartiality and Non-Partisanship in Building Ethical Integrity of Public Service
- 10 Sports Ethics