Moral Relativism vs. Moral Universalism
The debate between moral relativism and moral universalism centers on whether ethical principles are culturally dependent or universally applicable. This philosophical discussion has significant implications for cross-cultural interactions, global ethics, and the development of universally accepted moral standards.
Moral Relativism in Civil Services
- Moral Relativism posits that moral values and ethical principles are not absolute but vary across different cultures and societies. This perspective emphasizes understanding and respecting cultural diversity when making decisions.
Significance
- Cultural Sensitivity: Helps tailor policies to respect diverse cultural practices, ensuring inclusiveness. Example: India's constitution recognizes cultural diversity with different personal laws for various religious communities.
- Flexibility: ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material before the last six months of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Ethics, Integrity & Aptitude
- 1 Role of Impartiality and Non-Partisanship in Building Ethical Integrity of Public Service
- 2 Relevance of Swami Vivekananda’s Moral Philosophy in Contemporary Society
- 3 Foundational Values of Civil Services: Measures to Ensure their Effectiveness
- 4 Bioethics and its Significance
- 5 Ethical Dimensions of Celebrity Endorsements
- 6 Moral Values and Ethical Leadership
- 7 Ethical Issues and Challenges in Social Media
- 8 AI in Decision Making: Impact on Administration
- 9 Impact of Probity in Governance on Administrative Effectiveness and Public Trust
