Right to Silence
Recently, Supreme Court said that all accused have a right to silence and investigators cannot force them to speak up or admit guilt.
- Right to silence emanates from Article 20(3), which states that no one can be compelled to be a witness against himself.
- This protection is limited only to criminal proceedings.
- Right is not available to a person who is being interrogated under Customs Act, 1962, or Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, since person is not “accused of an offence” and isn’t entitled to a lawyer.
- In Nandini Satpathy vs. P.L. Dani case, SC stated that compelling a person to answer a question ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material before the last six months of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Related Content
- 1 Rights of Non-Tribals in Scheduled Areas
- 2 Judicial Recusal
- 3 Data Governance Quality Index (DGQI)
- 4 Article 355
- 5 Governor's Power to Dismiss the Ministers
- 6 Commission of Railway Safety
- 7 Right to Change Name
- 8 Prevention of Damage to Public Property
- 9 Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act 2023
- 10 Rule 176 vs. Rule 267 of Rajya Sabha
Current Affairs
- 1 Rights of Non-Tribals in Scheduled Areas
- 2 Judicial Recusal
- 3 Data Governance Quality Index (DGQI)
- 4 Article 355
- 5 Governor's Power to Dismiss the Ministers
- 6 Commission of Railway Safety
- 7 Right to Change Name
- 8 Prevention of Damage to Public Property
- 9 Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act 2023
- 10 Rule 176 vs. Rule 267 of Rajya Sabha
