Madras High Court Sets Aside Restraints on Puducherry Lt.Governor
A Madras High Court 2019 order restraining Puducherry Lt. Governor from interfering in the day-to-day affairs of the elected government was set aside by a division bench recently stating that the elected Chief Minister and the appointed Lt. Governor should work in unison.
Court’s Verdict
- The Bench stated in its that its role is not to lay down who has residual control — whether it is the Council of Ministers or the Administrator — but to stress the existing legal framework under which their powers are defined.
- The main ground to set aside the previous verdict is that ....
Do You Want to Read More?
Subscribe Now
Take Annual Subscription and get the following Advantage
The annual members of the Civil Services Chronicle can read the monthly content of the magazine as well as the Chronicle magazine archives.
Readers can study all the material before the last six months of the Civil Services Chronicle monthly issue in the form of Chronicle magazine archives.
Related Content
- 1 New Initiatives for Cyber Crime Prevention
- 2 7th National Security Strategy Conference, 2024
- 3 Supreme Court Tightens Law on Child Pornography
- 4 SC Emphasises Establishment of Gram Nyayalayas
- 5 First Meeting of ANRF Governing Board
- 6 20th Maritime State Development Council
- 7 Parliamentary Committee on Official Language
- 8 National Conference on Universal Access to Healthcare
- 9 Cabinet Accepts Recommendations on Simultaneous Elections
- 10 Lokpal's Inquiry Wing: New Push towards Anti-Corruption Efforts
- 1 Parliament Approves Three Central Sanskrit Universities
- 2 Govt Invokes Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 to Fight Coronavirus
- 3 Govt Declared Masks, Hand Sanitisers ‘Essential’ Commodities
- 4 Government Approves Change of Land Use for Central Vista Development
- 5 India Releases Draft Defence Procurement Procedure 2020
- 6 UP Passes Ordinance to Recover Damages to Property during Protests, Strikes
- 7 ECI Unveils Roadmap for Revamp of Electoral Process
- 8 Supreme Court Ruling Against Judicial Transparency